>>512508201
>Idk senpai, a lot of people documented and wrote about Jesus.
Not really, mostly just people in the Bible
>Jesus never wrote about himself.
And that's a good thing why ? If there was a gospel according to Jesus you'd all be all over it as an ultimate proof so that's bullshit.
>Ppl cite how the Bible is a bunch of different authors and text and is inconsistent, but if anything that kind of proves its worthiness. If you had several witnesses to a crime, they would all say slightly different things but their story overall would average to the same major points. Like what the Gospel does.
They literally got the genealogy of Jesus wrong, if you think inconsistency means accuracy you're coping hard
>It is sus when one person writes a religious text overnight, and then proclaims it was magically given to him.
You mean like Moses and 10 commandments ?
>And we have a lot of witnesses and good modern records of John Smith.
So when Jesus has witnesses it means it's real but when Smith has witnesses it means it's fake ? Wow.
>Polygamy wasn't even in the book of Mormon until John was cheating on his wife, and then he decided to canonize polygamy.
And Epistles say a bunch of things Jesus never said
I'm not saying Mormonism is real btw, I'm saying it's all fake but the double standard is just funny.