>>514919862
>Getting half the population excited about something isn't exactly the boast you might think. Just look at pop culture.
So is a cultural norm important or not? Pop culture is culture specifically because so many people partake in it. A pro or anti abortion sentiment as an aspect of culture is dependent on participation. Why do you denigrate pop culture when your entire argument is that we secretly regard unborn babies as being non sentient since we count our years on earth from the day we leave the womb? you undermine yourself because, again, you're hysterical and reaching.
>And in all that time, nobody thought to normalize age based on conception. How compelling.
so they were actually in favor of abortion but didn't know it because we measure our years post-womb?
>Neato
So you're just dodging the point. There's plenty of other reasons why we count from our birthdate. Maybe it's a philosophical disposition. Maybe convenience. But it makes no sense to say "Ah this cultural norm proves we don't think of them as living beings" and then reject other cultural norms that prove you wrong as irrelevant. Obviously we regard and regarded natal babies as living human beings because of what an uphill fight abortion legalization was. I don't see how you can argue this. normally people in your camp argue that they aren't alive, not that society secretly agreed with you all along.

Basically, you're retarded. or just crafting bait.