Anonymous
(ID: yRLGWWgm)
9/9/2025, 1:20:46 AM
No.515162787
9/9/2025, 1:20:46 AM
No.515162787
>>515162214
>I think you believe you are being personally attacked. You are not, I assure you
I never considered that. You should stop trying to read minds.
>It literally couldn't be less about you if I tried.
There's nothing about what I said, that should lead you to think that I thought it was.
>No need for the hostility
You opened by calling the athests' stance retarded and convoluted, and then gave no supporting evidence.
Then you tried to claim that an agnostic is a separate category, rather than a subcategory of atheism and of theism. You're dumb as fuck,
>I simply want you to continue believing in whatever it is you believe
Not when you started this by making baseless claims about my stance.
>Even if that belief is that I am a retard
You've proven no reason to assume otherwise.
>It's quite alright for you to do so
Didn't need your permission.
>But most importantly its best if you continue to believe whatever religious dogma you subscribe to.
I have no religious dogma, as none have even attempted to provide any evidence to meet their burden of proof. I continue to withhold any judgement on such things until then. Which automatically puts me in the category of agnostic atheist. Because one is about knowledge and one is about belief.
Please read a philosophy textbook about epistemology, before you try this again.
>I think you believe you are being personally attacked. You are not, I assure you
I never considered that. You should stop trying to read minds.
>It literally couldn't be less about you if I tried.
There's nothing about what I said, that should lead you to think that I thought it was.
>No need for the hostility
You opened by calling the athests' stance retarded and convoluted, and then gave no supporting evidence.
Then you tried to claim that an agnostic is a separate category, rather than a subcategory of atheism and of theism. You're dumb as fuck,
>I simply want you to continue believing in whatever it is you believe
Not when you started this by making baseless claims about my stance.
>Even if that belief is that I am a retard
You've proven no reason to assume otherwise.
>It's quite alright for you to do so
Didn't need your permission.
>But most importantly its best if you continue to believe whatever religious dogma you subscribe to.
I have no religious dogma, as none have even attempted to provide any evidence to meet their burden of proof. I continue to withhold any judgement on such things until then. Which automatically puts me in the category of agnostic atheist. Because one is about knowledge and one is about belief.
Please read a philosophy textbook about epistemology, before you try this again.