Anonymous
(ID: QemZM+/p)
9/12/2025, 1:34:16 PM
No.515668857
9/12/2025, 1:34:16 PM
No.515668857
>>515668751
For stalking, the prosecution must establish a course of conduct directed at a person, and each alleged act must fall within a listed form in section 21A subsection 2. They must also prove the mental element in section 21A subsection 3. If they proceed on the objective pathway, they must go further and show that a named person actually experienced fear or harm and that your conduct caused it. Reporting on a public police operation from public vantage points is not, by itself, conduct directed at a person. The correct strategy is to force particulars. Through counsel, require the alleged victim to be identified by name or unique identifier. For each alleged act, require the paragraph of subsection 2 that is relied upon, together with date, time, place, and an explanation of how that act is said to be directed at that person rather than at police activity in general. If the objective route is relied upon, require concrete proof of actual fear or harm and a clear causal chain tied to your conduct. Keep ready the statutory defence in section 21A subsection 4A where conduct without malice occurred in the course of public affairs communication. Hold that point until particulars arrive so it can be raised on a clear record. You assist counsel by providing a neutral chronology of dates, approximate times, locations, and where you were relative to any cordon, plus unaltered screenshots of the identified posts and the original image files.
For stalking, the prosecution must establish a course of conduct directed at a person, and each alleged act must fall within a listed form in section 21A subsection 2. They must also prove the mental element in section 21A subsection 3. If they proceed on the objective pathway, they must go further and show that a named person actually experienced fear or harm and that your conduct caused it. Reporting on a public police operation from public vantage points is not, by itself, conduct directed at a person. The correct strategy is to force particulars. Through counsel, require the alleged victim to be identified by name or unique identifier. For each alleged act, require the paragraph of subsection 2 that is relied upon, together with date, time, place, and an explanation of how that act is said to be directed at that person rather than at police activity in general. If the objective route is relied upon, require concrete proof of actual fear or harm and a clear causal chain tied to your conduct. Keep ready the statutory defence in section 21A subsection 4A where conduct without malice occurred in the course of public affairs communication. Hold that point until particulars arrive so it can be raised on a clear record. You assist counsel by providing a neutral chronology of dates, approximate times, locations, and where you were relative to any cordon, plus unaltered screenshots of the identified posts and the original image files.