>>519325250
>which relies on a massive assumption: that there is no God
What? No, it doesn't rely on that assumption at all.
You are in fact the one making a massive assumption, i.e.:
>If God exists, then it has the properties and the personality traits that I/my priests ascribe to it
Why do you assume that God would care about entropy?
Oh, let me guess. You think "God" can only be Yahweh or whatever?