Anonymous
(ID: COvpMKCJ)
10/20/2025, 10:11:17 AM
No.519348533
10/20/2025, 10:11:17 AM
No.519348533
>>519348341
>Sahih isnt quran
Never was the claim, unless you're a Quran only or Shia, you must accept Sahih Al-Bukhari as your Quran is nonsense without it.
>Sahih al bukhari isnt an infallible source like the Quran
This argument only works on retards who don't understand Islamic theology, which is what you're hoping for. Again the claim isn't that it's infalliable, it's that it is Sahih, which it is. I'm sure you'll tell me you never used Bukhari for anything ever right?
People aren't falling for this lazy Taqiyya demonic trash anymore. Defend your Prophets actions that night or you're a coward, it's that simple.
>Sahih isnt quran
Never was the claim, unless you're a Quran only or Shia, you must accept Sahih Al-Bukhari as your Quran is nonsense without it.
>Sahih al bukhari isnt an infallible source like the Quran
This argument only works on retards who don't understand Islamic theology, which is what you're hoping for. Again the claim isn't that it's infalliable, it's that it is Sahih, which it is. I'm sure you'll tell me you never used Bukhari for anything ever right?
People aren't falling for this lazy Taqiyya demonic trash anymore. Defend your Prophets actions that night or you're a coward, it's that simple.