>>519467559
which mission was that?

>>519467736
>the moon's highly reflective surface
it can be done, but the signal is weak and imprecise due to scattering on the surface. the retros give a much strong and more consistent return.
>no its all fake and cant go to the telescopes and watch and if i could it would be fake anyway etc etc etc

>>519467991
yes, there really is. really really.