Anonymous
(ID: 7rC9RhZ6)
10/31/2025, 12:36:31 PM
No.520255373
>>520255134
There is no exif data on that webm.
You're just lying.
And again:
>The civilian maps are not accurate to size, nor placement, nor scale of military objects.
>The civilian maps are not accurate to size, nor placement, nor scale of military objects.
>The civilian maps are not accurate to size, nor placement, nor scale of military objects.
>The civilian maps are not accurate to size, nor placement, nor scale of military objects.
So it doesn't matter what your "geotag" (that doesn't exist) says:
The exposion is near or at the VISUAL HORIZON
Observed from ELEVATION.
Do you get that?
(you won't answer this and will just insult me)
There is no exif data on that webm.
You're just lying.
And again:
>The civilian maps are not accurate to size, nor placement, nor scale of military objects.
>The civilian maps are not accurate to size, nor placement, nor scale of military objects.
>The civilian maps are not accurate to size, nor placement, nor scale of military objects.
>The civilian maps are not accurate to size, nor placement, nor scale of military objects.
So it doesn't matter what your "geotag" (that doesn't exist) says:
The exposion is near or at the VISUAL HORIZON
Observed from ELEVATION.
Do you get that?
(you won't answer this and will just insult me)