Anonymous
(ID: hpFAnFFH)
11/10/2025, 12:42:53 AM
No.521018124
11/10/2025, 12:42:53 AM
No.521018124
>>521017888
checked
they scrubbed the article but there are archives:
https://www.bishop-accountability.org/news2009/11_12/2009_12_17_Jones_PedophileRing.htm
>n explanation that to some appears to debunk a conspiracy theory just further confirms others' suspicions, said University of Toronto psychology professor Jordan B. Peterson.
>"It's very difficult to disprove a conspiracy theory, because every bit of disproving evidence can be just written off as additional evidence that these conspirators are particularly intelligent and sneaky," he said.
>Conspiracy theories are usually started by people who are very untrusting and it gathers steam among others who are somewhat untrusting, Peterson said.
>They're psychologically compelling because they neatly tie together troubling facts or assertions, he said. When things go badly there are often many explanations, and an orchestrated conspiracy "should be pretty low on your list of plausible hypotheses," Peterson said.
>"A good rule of thumb is: Don't presume malevolence where stupidity is sufficient explanation," he said.
No malevolence here goy, just stupidity. It was just by mistake the children got raped goy.
checked
they scrubbed the article but there are archives:
https://www.bishop-accountability.org/news2009/11_12/2009_12_17_Jones_PedophileRing.htm
>n explanation that to some appears to debunk a conspiracy theory just further confirms others' suspicions, said University of Toronto psychology professor Jordan B. Peterson.
>"It's very difficult to disprove a conspiracy theory, because every bit of disproving evidence can be just written off as additional evidence that these conspirators are particularly intelligent and sneaky," he said.
>Conspiracy theories are usually started by people who are very untrusting and it gathers steam among others who are somewhat untrusting, Peterson said.
>They're psychologically compelling because they neatly tie together troubling facts or assertions, he said. When things go badly there are often many explanations, and an orchestrated conspiracy "should be pretty low on your list of plausible hypotheses," Peterson said.
>"A good rule of thumb is: Don't presume malevolence where stupidity is sufficient explanation," he said.
No malevolence here goy, just stupidity. It was just by mistake the children got raped goy.