Anonymous
(ID: ZErQb6SI)
11/11/2025, 4:03:23 AM
No.521108574
>>521107376
The difference is that states that have legal weed have it because a majority of the state voted for it in a referendum. The Feds will be literally trampling on the consent of the governed if they try to ban it. Silencers are a bad comparison because there's a literal handful of people interested in silencers. Millions of weed users. The Feds banning weed stores in a legal state would be more analogous to banning all gun stores in a red state. Both are constitutionally protected and there's local majority support and it would get spicy if they tried
The difference is that states that have legal weed have it because a majority of the state voted for it in a referendum. The Feds will be literally trampling on the consent of the governed if they try to ban it. Silencers are a bad comparison because there's a literal handful of people interested in silencers. Millions of weed users. The Feds banning weed stores in a legal state would be more analogous to banning all gun stores in a red state. Both are constitutionally protected and there's local majority support and it would get spicy if they tried