Anonymous
(ID: RI1uuyra)
11/11/2025, 4:17:59 AM
No.521109438
>>521107093
Have to overturn wickard v filburn. Which stated which a single man growing extra wheat to feed to a pig his family would privately consumed is interstate commerce. Which was entirely unneeded because the man was taking gov money to comply to supply control but then not complying...
Have to overturn wickard v filburn. Which stated which a single man growing extra wheat to feed to a pig his family would privately consumed is interstate commerce. Which was entirely unneeded because the man was taking gov money to comply to supply control but then not complying...