>>18766032

>Well you see, ChatGPT

No.

>Nick has more credibility than Meltzer and Tony combined

In the wrestling world, absolutely not. Not even in the slightest. He is as irrelevant as the people in the credits for a Marvel movie. Integral to the movie of course, but irrelevant to the viewer.

>He also effectively has just as much reach as they do via his takedowns of them

Hilariously untrue and stupid. Look at you, are you a bot? Am I a bot? We are here discussing AEW and Meltzer and Nick's role in this. I am looking at it objectively, you are defending Nick's insipid take.

>Nobody else has effectively torpedoed them as much as he has

Wrong not only in this instance, but on a deeper instance. Nick and Dave have torpedoed the company on their own. An irrelevant man on twitter that no one knows has no impact in any sense to their business.

>This makes him an existential threat to the false narratives they spin.

It makes him another crazy person screaming into the void and posting screenshots with a self-affirming AI. It reads like he's right because he isn't willing to look at it from an outside lens, he thinks that he is somehow important in this and he in every single aspect of business operations on AEW is not relevant in any minute capacity.

He could know a lot about Hollywood, about business, about social media, thinking that working on a special effect in a marvel movie somehow makes you an authority on cinematography and the film world is the danger of people like Nick. He is so close to right that he is helplessly wrong in his conclusion because of his ego and sense of self-importance.