Anonymous
6/12/2025, 8:48:25 PM
No.81473190
>>81473043
>That's just an assertion, does that happen regularly?
Yes? How many women has Drake fucked? How many women has R Kelly fucked? How many women did the guys from Metallica fuck when they were at their peak? If you want direct proof that it happens, then there are videos of Til Lindemann fucking groupies on stage.
>If it does then sure, being a famous musician might help with women due to the status and idolization.
So if it's true, then you agree that the blackpill is inaccurate.
>Can everyone become a famous musician?
No, but it's irrelevant. It's used to demonstrate that socioeconomic status plays a big role in women's attraction to men. You don't need to be a famous musician. If you live in a meritocratic society and you become the best at some obscure niche thing, there will be women who will want to fuck you. There's that "farmer with the biggest yams" analogy that's used by evopsych researchers.
>I don't know who that is.
Look him up. According to the black pill he should have never gotten laid.
>Exceptions don't negate rules. If I grabbed 1000 guys that are below average in looks and height and 1000 guys that are above average in looks and height, which group do you think will have more success with and options for women?
If other variables are controlled for, like the socioeconomic status of the men, then it will be the latter group. But this example doesn't illustrate the blackpill. The blackpill isn't "looks matter". The balckpill is "looks are all that matters". When it's so obviously wrong. Go read these two papers:
>https://labs.la.utexas.edu/buss/files/2018/09/Schmitt-Buss2018_ReferenceWorkEntry_SexDifferencesInLong-TermMatin.pdf
>https://sci-hub.se/https://link.springer.com/rwe/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_3721-1
>That's just an assertion, does that happen regularly?
Yes? How many women has Drake fucked? How many women has R Kelly fucked? How many women did the guys from Metallica fuck when they were at their peak? If you want direct proof that it happens, then there are videos of Til Lindemann fucking groupies on stage.
>If it does then sure, being a famous musician might help with women due to the status and idolization.
So if it's true, then you agree that the blackpill is inaccurate.
>Can everyone become a famous musician?
No, but it's irrelevant. It's used to demonstrate that socioeconomic status plays a big role in women's attraction to men. You don't need to be a famous musician. If you live in a meritocratic society and you become the best at some obscure niche thing, there will be women who will want to fuck you. There's that "farmer with the biggest yams" analogy that's used by evopsych researchers.
>I don't know who that is.
Look him up. According to the black pill he should have never gotten laid.
>Exceptions don't negate rules. If I grabbed 1000 guys that are below average in looks and height and 1000 guys that are above average in looks and height, which group do you think will have more success with and options for women?
If other variables are controlled for, like the socioeconomic status of the men, then it will be the latter group. But this example doesn't illustrate the blackpill. The blackpill isn't "looks matter". The balckpill is "looks are all that matters". When it's so obviously wrong. Go read these two papers:
>https://labs.la.utexas.edu/buss/files/2018/09/Schmitt-Buss2018_ReferenceWorkEntry_SexDifferencesInLong-TermMatin.pdf
>https://sci-hub.se/https://link.springer.com/rwe/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_3721-1