>>81475869
>How are you going to afford completely unaccountable sexual freedom for women, yet demand accountability from chad at the same time? You can't
Certainly. These were two uninformed morons, one of them betrayed the other
>All that can be done is advise women, and you act like it's an attack on their value or agency as a person.
Uh no. I never said that. Is this an "impersonal you"?
>If you loved women, why do you want them to end up single mothers who feel tricked?
I do? Where did I say that? Maybe I'm misunderstanding something.