>>81497478
children have the right to reproduce. taking that capacity away because they're "trans" - your logic - is genocide against that population. it doesn't matter if you convince them it's "best for them," it is genocide. you might proceed to talk about extremely expensive and uncertain things like freezing eggs and sperm, but that would be stupid, because now you're talking about children, who haven't had time to develop reproductive ability. if "there are trans children", then there are meant to be "trans children" -- if you "trans" the "trans children", they can't reproduce, and "trans" will be eliminated from the gene pool over time. that is genocide, and honestly, it seems intentional. some people just hate anyone different, and would rather enforce a frankenstein of normalcy by any means at their disposal.