Anonymous
6/15/2025, 1:20:32 PM
No.81498958
>>81497744
I made a general to discuss this since there seems to be some interest about it, you can find it at >>81498902
Anyway
>as a bottom male I'd be one fewer competition out there for the Tops
It's an interesting situation, because I believe a lot of bottoms have no shot at getting women, but the mere fact that they exist creates a greater supply of men to date and therefore disrupts the dating market. Our current system is a lose/lose.
>What are some of the incentives for the bottom males though??
I can think of a few. For one, I think a lot of people really are naturally submissive and would prefer the safety and comfort of obeying and serving someone else to the responsibility and stress of making difficult decisions. A lot of people say this is why they like to submit and I can understand it. Life gets easier for bottoms in terms of labor as well. The top is expected to provide for the family - the bottom might work, but all of its income is supplemental. It doesn't have to stress itself at a difficult job to support a family, it can just be a househusband. Further, all of the benefits conferred on society at large would apply to the bottoms, too. Further, most bottoms would never be in a relationship otherwise, but this way they get to be a part of a loving family unit that cares for them. And all the benefits of society at large apply to them too - they would enjoy living among gradually more and more competent people as only the tops pass on their genetics and only the tops fulfill the high profile jobs.
>I think that's why it might be ideal to "encourage" bottom males to think about their potential future even when they're young
I'm worried that this coercion might not be conducive towards happiness.
I made a general to discuss this since there seems to be some interest about it, you can find it at >>81498902
Anyway
>as a bottom male I'd be one fewer competition out there for the Tops
It's an interesting situation, because I believe a lot of bottoms have no shot at getting women, but the mere fact that they exist creates a greater supply of men to date and therefore disrupts the dating market. Our current system is a lose/lose.
>What are some of the incentives for the bottom males though??
I can think of a few. For one, I think a lot of people really are naturally submissive and would prefer the safety and comfort of obeying and serving someone else to the responsibility and stress of making difficult decisions. A lot of people say this is why they like to submit and I can understand it. Life gets easier for bottoms in terms of labor as well. The top is expected to provide for the family - the bottom might work, but all of its income is supplemental. It doesn't have to stress itself at a difficult job to support a family, it can just be a househusband. Further, all of the benefits conferred on society at large would apply to the bottoms, too. Further, most bottoms would never be in a relationship otherwise, but this way they get to be a part of a loving family unit that cares for them. And all the benefits of society at large apply to them too - they would enjoy living among gradually more and more competent people as only the tops pass on their genetics and only the tops fulfill the high profile jobs.
>I think that's why it might be ideal to "encourage" bottom males to think about their potential future even when they're young
I'm worried that this coercion might not be conducive towards happiness.