Anonymous
6/15/2025, 4:10:35 PM
No.81500208
>>81497743
>It's like you are dismantling your own argument,
it's called discussing the subject in general. part of my argument is that you are an idiot, which that point was in support of. usually when people say "let" they mean "let" and not "juice with hormones and make." this is like saying "let women's breasts get bigger!" and meaning "get women massive boob jobs." it's bizarre and forced language. why do you feel the need to hide something you believe in under so many layers of euphemism?
>>81497755
trimming the tree vs uprooting it is a ridiculous comparison that you make every single time this subject is discussed. that no surgeries are being performed on people 18 is a lie you tell every time this subject is discussed. there are celebrities, public figures who have had surgery performed on them under 18. why would you lie so blatantly about something you believe in?
>>81497780
you are proposing a system in which gender-nonconforming people are sterilized and chemically & surgically altered with untested and unknown consequences, rather than simply treating them well no matter what they do or look like. you are the person castrating gays. you and so many other people are dug in neck deep on this nuttiness...i don't think you'll ever admit you were wrong, but you pretty clearly know it at this point, or you wouldn't tell the same exact parade of lies every single time like this. i just dont understand how you claim to care about people and then you're fine with the "best" medical treatment being to shrivel their dicks and nuts and then cut them off. i should think at the very least you should be clamoring for medical research into how to ameliorate the distress they are in *without* that happening...after all, drag queens just tuck. if the goal is looking female the first step would be trap lessons. why is it pills?
>It's like you are dismantling your own argument,
it's called discussing the subject in general. part of my argument is that you are an idiot, which that point was in support of. usually when people say "let" they mean "let" and not "juice with hormones and make." this is like saying "let women's breasts get bigger!" and meaning "get women massive boob jobs." it's bizarre and forced language. why do you feel the need to hide something you believe in under so many layers of euphemism?
>>81497755
trimming the tree vs uprooting it is a ridiculous comparison that you make every single time this subject is discussed. that no surgeries are being performed on people 18 is a lie you tell every time this subject is discussed. there are celebrities, public figures who have had surgery performed on them under 18. why would you lie so blatantly about something you believe in?
>>81497780
you are proposing a system in which gender-nonconforming people are sterilized and chemically & surgically altered with untested and unknown consequences, rather than simply treating them well no matter what they do or look like. you are the person castrating gays. you and so many other people are dug in neck deep on this nuttiness...i don't think you'll ever admit you were wrong, but you pretty clearly know it at this point, or you wouldn't tell the same exact parade of lies every single time like this. i just dont understand how you claim to care about people and then you're fine with the "best" medical treatment being to shrivel their dicks and nuts and then cut them off. i should think at the very least you should be clamoring for medical research into how to ameliorate the distress they are in *without* that happening...after all, drag queens just tuck. if the goal is looking female the first step would be trap lessons. why is it pills?