>>81627054
>Why would a criteria he didn't have to follow in 2016 be the a deciding factor for why I voted for him in 2020?
Well idk. Youre the one who's pushing for the argument of "experience"
>And I like that you ignore he tried to rig that election because he lost so bad and when his vice president told him he wouldn't rig it for him he replaced him
Idk why thats relevant to the discussion. I didnt voted for him anyway