Anonymous
6/27/2025, 2:11:40 AM
No.81628361
>>81627966
Toppling "patriarchy" would just mean men would be oppressed more, only by rich women instead of rich men. There would be no alteration in a male's life except negative. There is no point in a male ever caring about "patriarchy". Patriarchy is either limited to rich men, in which case it is simply a class issue, or it benefits all men, in which case a male should not care because it benefits him.
There is no circumstance where a man should rationally oppose patriarchy, even if it did exist. Instead, he should focus purely on the class issue, or if he isn't a socialist of some form, the political issue of people outside of his sphere of social beliefs imposed their values on him. Feminism and feminists solely, and only, and in every way harm both class consciousness and men's health. At no point ever, and under any circumstance ever, is it ever, under any conceivable set of environments, a rational pursuit for any man to ever consider the use of tackling the patriarchy.
Toppling "patriarchy" would just mean men would be oppressed more, only by rich women instead of rich men. There would be no alteration in a male's life except negative. There is no point in a male ever caring about "patriarchy". Patriarchy is either limited to rich men, in which case it is simply a class issue, or it benefits all men, in which case a male should not care because it benefits him.
There is no circumstance where a man should rationally oppose patriarchy, even if it did exist. Instead, he should focus purely on the class issue, or if he isn't a socialist of some form, the political issue of people outside of his sphere of social beliefs imposed their values on him. Feminism and feminists solely, and only, and in every way harm both class consciousness and men's health. At no point ever, and under any circumstance ever, is it ever, under any conceivable set of environments, a rational pursuit for any man to ever consider the use of tackling the patriarchy.