Anonymous
6/27/2025, 1:22:07 PM
No.81632642
>>81632532
NTA but gender identity isn't in the realm of science, it's philosophy
Modern progressives have completely forgotten where the theories predating gender identity came from (early radical feminism --> gender nonconformism --> performative theory of gender, etc.)
Somewhere at the start of the 21st century queer philosophy stagnated and a politically charged hugbox took its place because of the culture war. None of the troons you talk to understand the basics of social constructivism as a philosophical point, and they rely instead on these "peer-reviewed studies". The "studies" you're thinking of virtually all relate to mental health prognosis of gender-affirming care, which is unrelated. The fact that validating how somebody feels makes them happier doesn't actually prove any insane philosophical frameworks about gender.
NTA but gender identity isn't in the realm of science, it's philosophy
Modern progressives have completely forgotten where the theories predating gender identity came from (early radical feminism --> gender nonconformism --> performative theory of gender, etc.)
Somewhere at the start of the 21st century queer philosophy stagnated and a politically charged hugbox took its place because of the culture war. None of the troons you talk to understand the basics of social constructivism as a philosophical point, and they rely instead on these "peer-reviewed studies". The "studies" you're thinking of virtually all relate to mental health prognosis of gender-affirming care, which is unrelated. The fact that validating how somebody feels makes them happier doesn't actually prove any insane philosophical frameworks about gender.