Anonymous
6/30/2025, 12:40:58 AM
No.81661607
>>81660422
I didn't say it's wrong BECAUSE it's a projection.
I said it's wrong, and it's a projection.
It's wrong because it's anti-human.
And anti-human is a classic hallmark of shadow projection.
>>81660508
I didn't attack you, I said it's an immature stance. Just because you take offense to it since you identify with the idea as a part of ego, and felt attacked, doesn't mean I attacked you. Big difference.
Take note of what I said "anti-natalism is peak immaturity". You are not anti-natalism. Nor is it even your idea. It is merely something you identify with.
>strict apriori reasoning based on evidence.
Lol apriori reasoning, by its very definition, doesn't come from evidence. It literally means "pre-evidence" or "pre-experience".
Intuition can be an example of a priori knowledge. It's a way of knowing that arises without reliance on direct sensory experience or logical deduction. For example, sensing that it will rain without seeing clouds or checking the weather, no external evidence, suggests a kind of knowing prior to experience.
>I care about evidence
How very extroverted sensoid of you.
>I'm not antinatlist because I think humans are parasites.
I'll take the bait. Why are you anti natalist?
Inb4 you say humans are parasites in different words and then I quote this spoiler in a reply to (you).
I didn't say it's wrong BECAUSE it's a projection.
I said it's wrong, and it's a projection.
It's wrong because it's anti-human.
And anti-human is a classic hallmark of shadow projection.
>>81660508
I didn't attack you, I said it's an immature stance. Just because you take offense to it since you identify with the idea as a part of ego, and felt attacked, doesn't mean I attacked you. Big difference.
Take note of what I said "anti-natalism is peak immaturity". You are not anti-natalism. Nor is it even your idea. It is merely something you identify with.
>strict apriori reasoning based on evidence.
Lol apriori reasoning, by its very definition, doesn't come from evidence. It literally means "pre-evidence" or "pre-experience".
Intuition can be an example of a priori knowledge. It's a way of knowing that arises without reliance on direct sensory experience or logical deduction. For example, sensing that it will rain without seeing clouds or checking the weather, no external evidence, suggests a kind of knowing prior to experience.
>I care about evidence
How very extroverted sensoid of you.
>I'm not antinatlist because I think humans are parasites.
I'll take the bait. Why are you anti natalist?
Inb4 you say humans are parasites in different words and then I quote this spoiler in a reply to (you).