>>81697642
>>81698193
To simplify it, there is either no difference in practical results, as liberals may say they value "all thing" or "amphibians" as well as people, but the end result is that the proportion of value leads to less care directed towards humans and family, or that the care is proportional to that of conservatives, meaning things like rocks receive such an infinitessimally small percentage of that empathy as to be meaningless. Ergo, your point is bullshit.