>>81743163
i mean by-and-large i'd default to assuming neither of these guys are paedos. sounds like he's just leapt the gun either because he MIGHT HAVE had a fair enough point then extrapolated too far, or he's doing that politically-correct contorting where he's shocked on behalf of some imaginary situation.

maybe to pederasts, actual "decriminalisation" robs them of the fun of it? footfrens wouldn't like feet if they were boobs, would they? has to be slightly off, taboo, whatever it is.