>>81765991
Don't abstract away the direct meaning of my words. You know what I'm saying. I do not believe that you're a monk on /r9k/, nor that you live your life for the love of the divine. And if you do, I believe you're using it as a distraction and that you'll grow weary of it soom enough. And even if you don't, then you're in that category of too-easily satisfied people to whom it really doesn't matter what they do, only that they do. That love is the only thing of worth is not necessary, but because all other things of worth have been made obsolete by technological progress. Well, you're purposefully talking around me instead of to me, so this'll probably be my last reply, but I wish you well. I reiterate that love and a relationship was, is and will remain a fundamental human want and need.