>>81798400
>If being a loser is inherently evil or an exclusively moral failing in your mind
Not at all. You are misunderstanding.
Pointing out you are a loser was only used as the justification for your preference for irrational ideologies.
I have never changed the meaning of the word.
In fact, being a loser is something within your control, if I thought you were inferior I wouldn't waste time calling out an inferior being.
I don't have to tell ants they are inferior to humans. They just are, and live unaware of such judgements.
It is because I believe in your capacity for change and thus value that I believe thay calling you out is worth doing.
>not as empathetic
I don't really care for this judgment.
But I will point out how, right after accusing me of a logical falacy, you made an appeal to emotion.