>>81799602
>No amount of shaming will convince me that this is somehow unreasonable or radical.
Antisemitism does imply perceived superiority.
Racialist implies superiority.
The literal definition of accelerationnism involves the push for radical change.
>hyperindividualism
Nothing that I said is "hyper". I did not propose anything radical. Nor did I advocate for the dissolution of comunities.
I advocate for the rational judgment of the individual on its own merit, instead of the collective.
>relatively new
Hardly, it's at the core of Christianity. Man is valuable because it was made in the image of God, that alone makes each person valuable.
EVEN if you don't believe in that moral justification, my point is that this idea is as old as western civilization.
And "race" was not perceived the same way in ancient times. This concept as it is understood today is even newer.
>weary
This implies alertness not overt animosity, which is, again, contrary to the definition of every label you have used.