>>82115784
>but unfortunately you're probably too short for that.

I'm 5'11. I suspect that this is neutral, and apparently, there was a study done where they did confirm this suspicion of mine. Peak male attractiveness in height is achieved somewhere between 6'2 and 6'3, which is pretty damn tall, but you're pretty much in a neutral zone between 5'10 and 6'1. I am likely around a year away from a chad-tier body, but I will have a bit of gyno, not that most women would notice a bit of gyno and be turned off by it. My pecs are pretty large. I can bench 315 for 7.

>Absolutely. Chad doesn't have to pay for women. Women generally provide for Chad.

Women generally have less money than men. Even if I were a 7 to 8/10 chad, I doubt a 7 to 8/10 stacy would want to provide for me. She would be expecting a bit more out of the relationship. I'm pretty certain, unless I got super lucky, that I would need to date down, but hopefully not something like two or three levels down.

Dating a 3/10 in her 40s would be doable, but I don't think I'd feel too good about myself. I am mentally ill, and although I receive NEETbux, I'm still dependent on my boomer dad, and if anything happens to him, I'm pretty fucked, so I feel like I actually need to find a provider girlfriend. People are much poorer than they used to be due to things like rising housing prices. What I would need is a woman who could provide housing for me, and the NEETbux I receive isn't even enough to take care of myself, so I would effectively be asking for a lot. I started this thread earlier. >>82104392