>>82202316
>how over is it for me in the eyes of channers?
Very over. I'm having hard time imagining scenario in which I'd consider single mom to be fine option. There probably is such situation and settings, but it's extremely hard to think of one on the fly. You'd have to meet bunch of more criteria to make up for that, or give up your child up adoption which also isn't ideal because we both would see you in a bad light, even though it would benefit me. I come from broken family which was later patched from two such leftovers with kids from previous marriages on both sides and I can tell you it's a mess which often further breaks.
I'm looking for relationship and whenever I look at dating profiles I first look at 5 things which almost always make me skip profile:
>has kids with someone else - instant interest loss
>is fat - instant interest loss
>loves world travel and parties - extremely hard to make up for it because it isn't compatible with family lifestyle I want
>has tattoos - has to be like 9-10/10 and my type to make up for it, if it's massive or in uncoverable places like whole sleeves or neck then it's instant skip
>doesn't want kids - skip unless she's extremely qt and on the younger side, like 20-25 because there is chance natural clock will start ticking within couple years I'd need to get to know her and build home anyway
Only scenarios that make being single mom less trashy are
>her man died in a war or work accident - almost completely fair and acceptable
>she was raped like that Fritzl daughter
And still you'd have to make up for it like >>82207264 said with providing your new guy with more kids than previous one. Also >>82203797