Anonymous
9/5/2025, 7:50:53 PM
No.82408944
>>82407375
>Why does everyone hate AI art?
Art is gesture, not just material. AI art generates material with no context, resulting in art that is vacant and meaningless. In a context where "meaning" is kinda the whole point, art without meaning becomes less than inert; it becomes a personal affront, which is what warrants vitriol.
What's worse is that AI art doesn't even really spit out good material, really. Garbled imprecise details, uninspired and derivative executions, continuity errors, spelling errors, errors errors errors everywhere...all the artistry is just. Gone.
So AI just isn't really good at anything it sets out to do. As the technology improves it will get better at creating material, sure, but that material will always remain vacant.
The attempt to replace the artist with a machine that just kinda generates images on the spot is misguided. It demonstrates a very fundamental misunderstanding of what the purpose of art even is in the first place. These soulless techniggers look at a painting and only see paint. And then they think, hm, you could get a machine to do this. Which is true but missing the point entirely.
Anyway death to all techniggers.
>Why does everyone hate AI art?
Art is gesture, not just material. AI art generates material with no context, resulting in art that is vacant and meaningless. In a context where "meaning" is kinda the whole point, art without meaning becomes less than inert; it becomes a personal affront, which is what warrants vitriol.
What's worse is that AI art doesn't even really spit out good material, really. Garbled imprecise details, uninspired and derivative executions, continuity errors, spelling errors, errors errors errors everywhere...all the artistry is just. Gone.
So AI just isn't really good at anything it sets out to do. As the technology improves it will get better at creating material, sure, but that material will always remain vacant.
The attempt to replace the artist with a machine that just kinda generates images on the spot is misguided. It demonstrates a very fundamental misunderstanding of what the purpose of art even is in the first place. These soulless techniggers look at a painting and only see paint. And then they think, hm, you could get a machine to do this. Which is true but missing the point entirely.
Anyway death to all techniggers.