>>82759814
I think it's fun to participate in the guessing game anyhow. I'm sure I've gotten all of them wrong, especially now that >>82759991 posted because I'm 100% sure that's Eiki and not my earlier guess.
>>82760373
We hope for things that aren't assured, so it's expected and all.
>though i wouldn't mind being taller as well
Aren't you pretty much just normal height? I guess if people can change their bodies though then the average height would increase too... The new standard might become 7' tall men.
>ur brain would still b vulnerable 2 blunt trauma even if ur bones don't break
>unless the material would absorb the strikes very well...
True, although this can be remedied, albeit very invasively. The woodpecker has its own solution to brain tears and rips, behold pic related. The idea is that their spongy bone in their skulls is capable of absorbing the blows. Beyond that, a problem with the brain is the fact that rapid acceleration and deceleration can cause the brain to tear inside. If the brain was thus given some kind of elastic, tendon-like portions throughout it then it may be able to withstand said forces without forming tears.

For the Vulcans I assume it has to be most of them. They just seemed very non-volatile and tactful to me. Trying to maximize logic and reason.
>nah it's a different guy. I found the utuber but i can't find the video. He must have deleted it. A real shame, it was a good one.
I see, I see. Hopefully you'd like the one video I sent too.
>Do u think dark matter exists? Or is theory of relativity just wrong?
I don't think it exists, no. The theory of relativity isn't proven wrong by that, not necessarily. It can be purely a cosmological problem and not a relativity issue. I've also heard of plasma cosmology as a potential explanation of dark matter and energy too, paired with lots of unseen mass.
>u should take care of ur posture!
B'^), I know.