>>82792416
I don't see the world objectively. Maybe a broken clock is right twice a day. I only have an IQ of 129, so a midwit, really, and I still have trouble because I see gender as about as invalid as race, not to say that eugenics are complete nonsense when separated from people's obsession with skin color. So, I'm okay with transgenderism. I have little concern for objective truth, because I'm lied to constantly all day 24/7 and see "facts" as inherently untrustworthy because I'm just smart enough to be able to see beyond the impressions but also stupid enough to not know how to make any worldview that doesn't fall apart. You could probably convince me to once again be against transgenderism with the correct string of words. Most midwits just end up picking a side and appealing to it in order to get past this. I'm not able to pick one, so I have little to add, but I am still painfully aware of the brutal predation that happens onto people who still think they care about the truth itself, in all its nuanced and trivial malaise, and not just its teeth. If you spend even a little time thinking for yourself, from your own makeshift axioms, almost nothing is convincing, so what remains when you do that is the hate. It's the lies. It's the ugly, from all angles. It sucks.
>For the past 2 years I've been thinking about this regularly.
You should. I did it for 7 months on the AT. Nature is insulting to the ego, and you wouldn't think it would make you feel all that much better, but it does. Best time of my life.
>The only thing holding you back is your addiction to modern comforts. Reel yourself in a bit and see your life for what it is.
It's not that easy, and you know it. Our technology is designed to make us addicted and that's more the a problem than self-control. The only way to fix it is to control your environment or become a monk. So long as you see a screen, you physically can't help but have your eyes drawn to it and your curiosity roused.