Anonymous
10/17/2025, 10:47:55 PM
No.82832252
>>82831794
In addition to feeling great, there is concrete evidence such as skin state, suppleness of muscle/body, lack of bloat, etc. Also while "feeling" can be subjective, mental clarity as well as elevated mood are still observable non-subjective effects.
>processed meat is a class 1 cancer carcinogen, and regular meat is a 2A cancer carcinogen
Good thing I focus on regular meat, but everything processed is definitively cancerous compared to normal variants, take any bread for instance and compare bakery-made versus processed brands.
>if eating human children would make you feel good, would that make it morally acceptable? what about dogs? just because it makes you feel nice doesn't mean its morally acceptable
My point was on tangible health benefits, not emotional feelings nor tastes. That said, I'm not against eating dogs for food but am against abusing them. And for children, obviously not but that's because I'm a human and other meat is fine for health. If I was a tiger or a vampire or some form of beast which requires it this entire discussion would probably be different, but as a species which evolved to survive cannibalism naturally is riskier than any other form of food so isn't even a hypothetical case to suggest to a human.
>>82832113
>but that you can get all the same nutrition from plants.
Not entirely the case as many plant foods contain chemicals which harm the efficiency of absorbing the nutrients they have. Of which our bodies do not have the proper enzymes to break them down and absorb properly, since we're naturally carnivores adapted to pre-digest meats through cooking. The fact you have to take a ton of supplements is sort of building the case that you're not meant to go on a vegan diet naturally. Furthermore with differences of compounds of the same nutrients, bioavailability, your own gut flora's state, there are a lot of differences in effectiveness between the same amount of nutrients take by supplement versus by food.
In addition to feeling great, there is concrete evidence such as skin state, suppleness of muscle/body, lack of bloat, etc. Also while "feeling" can be subjective, mental clarity as well as elevated mood are still observable non-subjective effects.
>processed meat is a class 1 cancer carcinogen, and regular meat is a 2A cancer carcinogen
Good thing I focus on regular meat, but everything processed is definitively cancerous compared to normal variants, take any bread for instance and compare bakery-made versus processed brands.
>if eating human children would make you feel good, would that make it morally acceptable? what about dogs? just because it makes you feel nice doesn't mean its morally acceptable
My point was on tangible health benefits, not emotional feelings nor tastes. That said, I'm not against eating dogs for food but am against abusing them. And for children, obviously not but that's because I'm a human and other meat is fine for health. If I was a tiger or a vampire or some form of beast which requires it this entire discussion would probably be different, but as a species which evolved to survive cannibalism naturally is riskier than any other form of food so isn't even a hypothetical case to suggest to a human.
>>82832113
>but that you can get all the same nutrition from plants.
Not entirely the case as many plant foods contain chemicals which harm the efficiency of absorbing the nutrients they have. Of which our bodies do not have the proper enzymes to break them down and absorb properly, since we're naturally carnivores adapted to pre-digest meats through cooking. The fact you have to take a ton of supplements is sort of building the case that you're not meant to go on a vegan diet naturally. Furthermore with differences of compounds of the same nutrients, bioavailability, your own gut flora's state, there are a lot of differences in effectiveness between the same amount of nutrients take by supplement versus by food.