>>82836507
You're basically just saying moral facts are "normative" without explaining why they actually obligate anyone. Facts don't tell people what to do.. only minds can do that. Saying "if they exist, we ought to follow them" is just assuming the point you're trying to prove. Existence alone doesn't create obligation.

Without a conscious moral source, "ought" loses its grounding and there's no real reason anyone has to follow those supposed truths.