Anonymous
11/6/2025, 6:47:46 PM
No.83033489
>>83033369
Animal products are good for you, and not consuming them is bad for you.
"Taste pleasure" is an unserious argument.
Animals are not intelligent, and nor are they sapient. The animals I eat do not pass the mirror test so it's not even obvious that they have a subjectivity to inflict pain upon.
Why do you draw the line at plants? Don't they deserve life too?
Why are humans not allowed to eat meat when every other meat-eating animal is allowed?
If contributing to society indirectly causes more meat consumption, then why don't you live in the woods?
>its morally wrong to inflict much more suffering unto innocent animals for your taste pleasure and "yummy in my tummy tum tum".
This seems very infantile.
Animal products are good for you, and not consuming them is bad for you.
"Taste pleasure" is an unserious argument.
Animals are not intelligent, and nor are they sapient. The animals I eat do not pass the mirror test so it's not even obvious that they have a subjectivity to inflict pain upon.
Why do you draw the line at plants? Don't they deserve life too?
Why are humans not allowed to eat meat when every other meat-eating animal is allowed?
If contributing to society indirectly causes more meat consumption, then why don't you live in the woods?
>its morally wrong to inflict much more suffering unto innocent animals for your taste pleasure and "yummy in my tummy tum tum".
This seems very infantile.