Anonymous
6/20/2025, 3:19:56 AM
No.16702962
>>16702917
If you don't take 2 balls from a box the next ball you take can't be from
>>16702854
>the same box
So I'd need to know how much of the premise is preserved. If this is an entirely new question with the same 3 starting boxes, then the answer is 1/2. If the confetti is preserved and you still pick your first ball from that box, then the answer is 3/8.
>>16702935
>still butthurt about the character in the problem being able to take a gold ball from the box without looking inside
As I said, even a blind person could tell a gold and silver ball apart. You're just an idiot. Not that how the person choosing was physically able to choose even matters as long as you're told they did. All you care about is the math.
>>16702947
>You're choosing between three gold balls
You are not choosing between 3 gold balls. You are either choosing between 2 gold balls or 1 gold ball depending on which random box you chose.
>>16702929
>I would have this information in the scenario you're having me play out
How does that help you outside the scenario?
>But I obviously know what I know
Oh? Then tell me the answer.
>Probability is based on knowledge. If you're going to arbitrarily deny me my knowledge to force an outcome it's just asinine.
Probability is based on a lack of knowledge.
>If you refer to me in the second person in a probability problem then I need the information I would have in the scenario described
That's not how this works. That's not how any of this works.
You flip a fair coin and look at it. What is the probability it is heads up? That's a perfectly fucking valid probability problem, dipshit. You are truly the dumbest motherfucker I've come across in a long time.
If you don't take 2 balls from a box the next ball you take can't be from
>>16702854
>the same box
So I'd need to know how much of the premise is preserved. If this is an entirely new question with the same 3 starting boxes, then the answer is 1/2. If the confetti is preserved and you still pick your first ball from that box, then the answer is 3/8.
>>16702935
>still butthurt about the character in the problem being able to take a gold ball from the box without looking inside
As I said, even a blind person could tell a gold and silver ball apart. You're just an idiot. Not that how the person choosing was physically able to choose even matters as long as you're told they did. All you care about is the math.
>>16702947
>You're choosing between three gold balls
You are not choosing between 3 gold balls. You are either choosing between 2 gold balls or 1 gold ball depending on which random box you chose.
>>16702929
>I would have this information in the scenario you're having me play out
How does that help you outside the scenario?
>But I obviously know what I know
Oh? Then tell me the answer.
>Probability is based on knowledge. If you're going to arbitrarily deny me my knowledge to force an outcome it's just asinine.
Probability is based on a lack of knowledge.
>If you refer to me in the second person in a probability problem then I need the information I would have in the scenario described
That's not how this works. That's not how any of this works.
You flip a fair coin and look at it. What is the probability it is heads up? That's a perfectly fucking valid probability problem, dipshit. You are truly the dumbest motherfucker I've come across in a long time.