Anonymous
6/25/2025, 6:15:26 PM
No.16707325
>>16705961
>Yeah, except for the uninstantiable empty-set causing an ontological paradox.
>>16706817
>it’s a deductively valid object that exists in every single model of ZF.
>>16706948
>Hey, bud, look, see that preprint?
>>16706020
>https://zenodo.org/records/15653461
>cross-framework embeddings into ... ZFC
>To verify that ROC retains its logical strength across standard foundations, we exhibit faithful and conservative translations into ... ZFC
so your nonsense is interpretable in a theory that your nonsense says is inconsistent by definition... how exactly is that suppose to be a plus towards your nonsense's validity?, God you are going to be chewed out by actual mathematicians...
>Yeah, except for the uninstantiable empty-set causing an ontological paradox.
>>16706817
>it’s a deductively valid object that exists in every single model of ZF.
>>16706948
>Hey, bud, look, see that preprint?
>>16706020
>https://zenodo.org/records/15653461
>cross-framework embeddings into ... ZFC
>To verify that ROC retains its logical strength across standard foundations, we exhibit faithful and conservative translations into ... ZFC
so your nonsense is interpretable in a theory that your nonsense says is inconsistent by definition... how exactly is that suppose to be a plus towards your nonsense's validity?, God you are going to be chewed out by actual mathematicians...