Anonymous
10/28/2025, 8:07:38 AM
No.16829425
>>16827755
Not the definition of a numerical base since you couldn't possibly have a radix set exactly equal to an imaginary, fractional, or irrational number of symbols. Its pretty nonsensical leap for you to say all of math would still work, when something as simple as counting is broken.
Not the definition of a numerical base since you couldn't possibly have a radix set exactly equal to an imaginary, fractional, or irrational number of symbols. Its pretty nonsensical leap for you to say all of math would still work, when something as simple as counting is broken.