>>16832963
>Ftl doesnt need to violate causality
which of the following two statements do you disagree with and why?
>FTL implies time travel
>time travel violates causality

the only argument i've seen against the latter would be, that time travel only goes back to the point when it was already invented and no earlier for some reason, but universal FTL travel (of either mass or information) would either not obey that restriction, or have an exploitable weakness based around that.

if ftl travel was real i'd travel back to the big bang and tell the great creator to fix his shit.