>>16841253
Its not my fault your irony comes off as idiocy anon. Get a grip.

>>16841256

Sure, fine, but first, understand at least the history behind the ideology of longitudinal electromagnetic forces and why they have some value in terms of theory development and experimentation:

In 1820 Ampère stood before the French Academy and demonstrated: two parallel currents attract each other. Currents in opposite directions repel, the opposite of stationary charges. But he didn’t stop there. Over the next several years, he developed an entire theory of electrodynamics. He designed clever experiments, isolating tiny current elements and measuring the forces between them. What he found was remarkable. Yes, moving charges attract sideways, the magnetic force we all learn about. But they also don’t stop repelling each other along their path. Ampère’s experiments made this clear: charges moving in the same direction still push each other away head-to-tail, a longitudinal repulsion that standard models don’t include. He derived this force mathematically, not as a correction to magnetism, but as a fundamental part of how current elements interact. And in the lab, he found ways to isolate and test it.

One of his cleverest setups used tightly wound coils, what he called helices. Each turn of the coil contributed a small element of current, some running side-by-side, others aligned head-to-tail. Now, according to standard thinking, these coils should have repelled each other, like two bar magnets aligned the same way. But instead… they attracted. This wasn’t evidence of a new attractive force, it was evidence that the standard picture was missing something.