Quezothen
11/9/2025, 1:02:27 PM
No.16841353
>>16841350
>the magnetic field itself is fundamentally a bivector because in muh special relativity fields are combined into muh tensor
Yes, the FORCE FIELD is a bivector, not the POTENTIAL FIELD exhibited by Aharonov & Bohm.
When you combine fields like that, of course you'll need more than one value vector to describe it... Only makes sense.
Doesn't mean that actually describes anything physical.
The whole idea of my theory is to posit that divergence of the magnetic vector potential is proportional to the gravitational potential and details a mathematical framework concise with known derivations which outlines the proportionality, positing Chi as key element.
>the magnetic field itself is fundamentally a bivector because in muh special relativity fields are combined into muh tensor
Yes, the FORCE FIELD is a bivector, not the POTENTIAL FIELD exhibited by Aharonov & Bohm.
When you combine fields like that, of course you'll need more than one value vector to describe it... Only makes sense.
Doesn't mean that actually describes anything physical.
The whole idea of my theory is to posit that divergence of the magnetic vector potential is proportional to the gravitational potential and details a mathematical framework concise with known derivations which outlines the proportionality, positing Chi as key element.