Anonymous
11/9/2025, 5:06:04 PM
No.16841515
>>16841353
>my theory is to posit that divergence of the magnetic vector potential is proportional to the gravitational potential
There’s no basis for that postulate though. When Einstein postulated a constant speed of light, it was based on the results of the Michelson and Morley interferometry experiments indicating a constant speed of light. When Bohr postulated the existence of stationary states it was because the discovery of braking radiation ruled out a classical model for electron dynamics. There are no experimental observations to support your postulate that magnetic vector potentials produce gravitational fields.
Glancing through the shit you’re posting in the thread, many of the equations you’re asserting aren’t even dimensionally correct, nor is there any indication that you’ve bothered to confirm if teh Lagrangian is still invariant under this choice of gauge other than to make some vague statement that you’ve ‘solved’ the need for gauge invariance.
>my theory is to posit that divergence of the magnetic vector potential is proportional to the gravitational potential
There’s no basis for that postulate though. When Einstein postulated a constant speed of light, it was based on the results of the Michelson and Morley interferometry experiments indicating a constant speed of light. When Bohr postulated the existence of stationary states it was because the discovery of braking radiation ruled out a classical model for electron dynamics. There are no experimental observations to support your postulate that magnetic vector potentials produce gravitational fields.
Glancing through the shit you’re posting in the thread, many of the equations you’re asserting aren’t even dimensionally correct, nor is there any indication that you’ve bothered to confirm if teh Lagrangian is still invariant under this choice of gauge other than to make some vague statement that you’ve ‘solved’ the need for gauge invariance.