>>149819715
So you actually put thousands of euros on it. I'm really sorry with the disallowed goal, iktf. In my honest opinion it was a bad bet. Actually not bad. Horrendous. First half goals, not to mention teams you know nothing about. It's not betting what you did, it's gambling, like slots. But you are right about wasting time and our life on this shit. Always engaged with a game. And to be honest, even if you'd play "correctly" , with the human psychology, chasing losses etc, i think the end result will be the same for everyone: losing it all.
BUT to prolong this 'death' playing optimal would look sth like this:
Skendija v FCSB to advance @1.30
It's 1.30 over 2 legs, 2 weeks, 2k . -> +600
It's the start of the season, many teams play to qualify, give their 100% , there's gonna be many spots in the next month. This is one of it. I know everything about this team, i know what they aim, the odds seem good. This is betting
Betting, not gambling. Speaking of which, the romanian gov was thinking to increase the tax on withdrawls on "games of luck" from 3% to 10%, cause gambling is bad regardless, okay?. What does betting on a market, with an edge, on FCSB to advance, have to do with degenerate slots gamblers? Thankfully they only raised it to 4%