>>150715332
>10 drivers from the 50s thru 70s
I'm not going to go through the whole history of the sport in this fucking thread. Read their fucking wikipedia articles if you want that.
>how their ferrari seasons on average compared to the current
Again, you prove that you know nothing about the history of the sport if you think you can just directly compare those seasons. Or that a 16-race record could have been achieved within the span of a single season back in the 50s.
And, no, the sport being different back then does not mean the drivers were worse.
>could it be that they had a strong car
Sure. Could it be that Ferrari also have a strong car, given that only one of their drivers does underperform while the other gets podiums?
>How many times did Antonelli steal a podium from Russell?
Why would he need to "steal" a podium? Why would Hamilton need to when there are other opportunities to finish top-3?
>He didn't keep his teammate off the podium
Exactly. That's what I said.
>Is he also maximizing his own mistakes?
Irrelevant. He was ready to score a podium when it mattered. Hamilton was not, and also is very error-prone.
>How?
Points tallies depend too much on things entirely unrelated to podium finishes. It's not the same metric.
>Was it not your cope
No. And you REALLY need to educate yourself on the topic already.