>>96939333
I'm going to say that it's likely it doesn't include the HSL version, as apparently that version was such a drain that scrapping and redoing from scratch was a preferable use of Paradox's time and money
>>96938738
As a sort of follow up to this, I suppose this explains why the game feels cheap, they definitely tried to develop the game as if it was still 2004 or so. 60 million does not cut it for anything over AA though I think a large part of the problems are contracting TCR and perhaps not a more prestigious studio. Rather bizarrely for Paradox I must say, as they wanted a bloodlines 2 in the first place