>>215609094
Okay, so putting aside that "has [visual] elements of rembrandt" seems indistinguishable from "looks like Rembrandt". Does "looks like Rembrandt" "visually identical to Rembrandt" or something like "has sufficient [visual] elements of rembrandt without being visually identical to Rembrandt"?
>if you can't be bothered to read my review or remember what i've said to you that's on you
I have read it and can remember, it's just that it's all irrelevant to the matter at hand.