>>712904636
I can't anymore. Well, I sort of can, but I can't in good faith say that games haven't been changing over the last 15 years or so, even if it's not "progression" like it used to be. PS2 being similar enough to PS3 I can agree to, PS3 being the exact same as PS5 I can't, so either retro is moving forward again or PS2 era game design actually resembles PS5-era stuff over the PS3.
On a related note... Did you know in most other fields, "retro" means a constantly rotating set of trends from 20-40ish years ago? Doesn't have to imply people moved on from those trends because they figured out how to manufacture something better.