Anonymous
7/17/2025, 3:49:19 AM
No.715672454
>>715671562
>You went from “prove it” to “they might’ve pissed on a Bible 100 years ago”
If you can prove that they were christian that means that they didnt piss on a bible retard. Imagine your mind being so innately disingenous that you think this is a court case and you can play lawyer turn pissing on a bible into a morality case and not a non-christian case based on my context. Litelral subhuman.
Notice how you made it more open ended to "many were openly religious" from "all were openly religious" because you cant prove shit. Guess what. You still have to prove your claim. Im waiting for you to prove that they were christian and not just dipped in the water as babies.
>You went from “prove it” to “they might’ve pissed on a Bible 100 years ago”
If you can prove that they were christian that means that they didnt piss on a bible retard. Imagine your mind being so innately disingenous that you think this is a court case and you can play lawyer turn pissing on a bible into a morality case and not a non-christian case based on my context. Litelral subhuman.
Notice how you made it more open ended to "many were openly religious" from "all were openly religious" because you cant prove shit. Guess what. You still have to prove your claim. Im waiting for you to prove that they were christian and not just dipped in the water as babies.