>>715691365
if the right to privacy comes at the cost of safety, social cohesion, propagandizing and ideology pushing (as it does now) then i would rather we enforce digital id. there is absolutely nothing you need to do online anonymously that is not also illegal, third world nonwithstanding

>>715691449
>You're asking why it's your responsibility to raise your own flesh and blood?
no. i am asking why is it that in the "grand game" of protecting my child i have to work so very fucking hard, fighting an uphill against corporations that invest trillions into studies on how exactly to mind break children with gacha, porn addiction, chatbot addiction, et cetera. if you dont see the disparity in power i and the impossible responsibility placed on the parent then i dont know what to tell you

online censorship is not bad, its long overdue, and you cant convince me otherwise