Anonymous
7/17/2025, 10:21:26 AM
No.715694443
>>715694052
no, that was an earlier application that was more generic. they split up that patent and tailored the application's claims specifically to sue palworld with. those new patents are the ones they are referencing in the suit because they know full well they don't really own generic ideas like throwing a ball.
no, that was an earlier application that was more generic. they split up that patent and tailored the application's claims specifically to sue palworld with. those new patents are the ones they are referencing in the suit because they know full well they don't really own generic ideas like throwing a ball.