Anonymous
7/17/2025, 11:25:26 AM
No.715697079
>>715696706
>but maybe the EU should also speedrun some regulation concerning chatbots
I can't really see how that's viable without harming privacy. Digital IDs could become a thing in theory but that's a massive risk for data breaches. Maybe quantum computing could alleviate that issue but it's still years from breaking in due to memory and storage being a major problem, although cloud-based hybrid quantum storage is promising in theory (see https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9650707 )
>your ""code""
As entertaining as it is, the issue is that it's still a recognizable pattern. Any pattern you could pick up right now will be -eventually- recognized by a sufficiently advanced neural network, so it won't work in the future.
>but maybe the EU should also speedrun some regulation concerning chatbots
I can't really see how that's viable without harming privacy. Digital IDs could become a thing in theory but that's a massive risk for data breaches. Maybe quantum computing could alleviate that issue but it's still years from breaking in due to memory and storage being a major problem, although cloud-based hybrid quantum storage is promising in theory (see https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9650707 )
>your ""code""
As entertaining as it is, the issue is that it's still a recognizable pattern. Any pattern you could pick up right now will be -eventually- recognized by a sufficiently advanced neural network, so it won't work in the future.